Democratic governments are expected to be sensitive to the dissatisfaction of the people. Youth restlessness is a disturbing variant. One generation goes wrong.
The spontaneous explosion of the youth violence in Nepal last week shows a government deeply engraved with young, digital, social expectations against the closure of social media practices. The so-called “Nepo Kids”-is a different issue that does not like the flashy lifestyle duties that are aroused among the citizens of the righteousness and the strongest ones.
Nepal is the safest country of South Asia after Bhutan. Bangladesh is the least safe, then India and then Sri Lanka. Nepal is a new democracy. The constitution that established a democratic government is only ten years. Until 2008, Hindu monarchy reigned. However, his legitimacy was steadily eroded from the 1990s, when a Maoist rebellion challenged almost rural areas. The massacre of the 2001 Interecine in the Royal Family ended all the claims of divine legitimacy or the rule of Dharma. An unsuccessful explanation for unexplained public explosions is a “foreign hand için that creates a problem to put pressure on the government. China or India, the northern and southern neighbors of Nepal, are the usual suspects.
India has multiple historical connections with Nepal. First, it is a widespread belief in Hinduism, which is common in both countries, but neither defines itself as a Hindu country. The Nepal’s 2015 Constitution defines this as “independent, indivisible, sovereign, secular, inclusive, democratic, socialism -oriented, federal democratic republican state”. The Indian Constitution describes itself as “sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic ,, but the words“ socialist ”and“ secular ”were placed in 1974 through a change. The Ultra Left Communist Nepal (Maoist Center) led by Pushpa Kamal Kamal Dahaal “Prachada ,, KP Sharma Oli (last week leader) Left-centered CPN (Marxist-Leninist) and Centralist, Social Democracy-oriented Nepali Deuba’s gold, under everything else, before everything. Despite its significant changing political philosophies and global harmony, in the coalition with each other.
Multi -party, innate democracy is not necessarily a bad thing. However, if public interest is not presented, it can be caricaturized as operational alliances for self -enlargement. Patriarchy and Gerontocracy (all three Nepal national political leaders are all over 70 years of age), a toxic combination in poor -populated countries with young population. After saying this, “Meritocrat Gerontocracy” is now a global trend that even technology barons want to live and work forever. Six of the G-20 countries, including the US, China, Russia, India, Brazil, Turkey and South Africa, there are over 70-year-old heads, Japan, Germany and the European Union close to the summit.
Nepal-India’s second quality of living together is a clear border in which millions of Nepal and Indians take place for tourism or business. The Madhesesi community on the Nepal plains on the Indian border has close family and cultural connections with Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in India. Trend Madhesesi, Mayor of Kathmandu, 35 -year -old Balendra Shah, an independent, a rapper and an engineer representing the “new Nepal” policy to the profession, an engineer focusing on political survival of politics.old regime”.
The third similarity with India is a professional trained army, which is apolitical, although the police support the suppression of civil disorders. In accordance with the newly emerging democratic roots of Nepal, a temporary prime minister for all parties, including Gen Z and the Nepal president, sought political negotiations on the appointment of a temporary prime minister.
In contrast, the Indian Army has never played such a high-profile political role in the case of 21-month 1975-77 emergency, all civilian freedoms were suspended and resulted in civilian unrest throughout the country. The settled Prime Minister Indira Gandhi ended when he called for new elections and made a political decision to restore civil trust and legitimacy. The ruling party has been defeated for the first time since 1947. The Janata Party, the coalition of the opposition groups, founded the new government and launched a constitutional reform to prevent the future misuse of the center’s emergency forces. This ranking of the reform is synchronized with those agreed in Nepal: the first elections that constitute political legitimacy, then the constitutional reform when necessary.
It is appropriate to test how deep insecurity has expanded through choices. The temporary PM is open to legal criticism for the precedent, which blur the red line between the constitutional basis, the judiciary and the political power to appoint Sushila Carki, an old chief justice. However, the choice of a woman’s legal armature is progressive and plays to the willing Nepal. A few additional consultants to the President or temporary ministers may expand the political representation of the basic decision -making process in steps towards an early and fair elections.
All South Asian economies are at lower medium income levels than the World Bank. Nepal has the lowest level of debt and has privileged loans – a support of $ 500 million for the development of infrastructure from the US government.
There is enough young energy to be built on the age of 25 to 27 years. One quarter of 29 million citizens of Nepal live abroad, a proof of their entrepreneurial souls. The total fertility rate is already below 2.0 and the population is expected to peake for 36 million in 2065. Literacy levels of youth (15-24 years), 92 percent at 92 percent, 91 percent (91 percent), but the third education registration, 14 percent, 28 percent in India, 21 percent in Bangladesh, 21 percent, 21 percent in Sri Lanka. This enters into young unemployment with only 12 percent in Bangladesh compared to 12 percent in India and 20 percent in India. The open border is a key asset that provides access to the fast -growing markets of India. Bilateral cooperation can increase Nepal’s share of the private sector in the non -agricultural economy between 60 and 65 percent, equal to India’s share of 70 to 75 percent, with associated benefits in employment and prosperity. The last civilian unrest is best seen as an expression of willing Nepal, not as a line of error. To help to realize these democratic desires and to achieve a progressive and flexible nepal.
